Why is this an issue?

In TypeScript, there are two ways to define properties or parameters that are potentially undefined:

interface Person {
  name: string;
  address: string | undefined;
}

let John = { name: "John", address: undefined };
interface Person {
  name: string;
  address?: string;
}

let John = { name: "John" };

This rule checks for optional property declarations that use both the ? syntax and unions with undefined, including cases where undefined is introduced through a type alias — even through alias chains or generic types.

interface Person {
  name: string;
  address?: string | undefined;   // Noncompliant: using both syntaxes is redundant
}

type MaybeString = string | undefined;
interface Contact {
  email?: MaybeString;            // Noncompliant: the alias already includes 'undefined'
}

type Maybe<T> = T | undefined;
interface Widget {
  label?: Maybe<string>;          // Noncompliant: the generic alias resolves to 'string | undefined'
}

type NumberOrUndefined = number | undefined;
type Attribute = string | NumberOrUndefined;
interface Form {
  value?: Attribute;              // Noncompliant: 'undefined' is reachable through the alias chain
}

Choose one of the syntaxes to declare optional properties and remove the other one. Consider using only | undefined if you want to make the property explicit in the object.

interface Person {
  name: string;
  address?: string;
}

type MaybeString = string | undefined;
interface Contact {
  email: MaybeString;
}

type Maybe<T> = T | undefined;
interface Widget {
  label: Maybe<string>;
}

type NumberOrUndefined = number | undefined;
type Attribute = string | NumberOrUndefined;
interface Form {
  value: Attribute;
}

The rule does not raise any issues when the TypeScript compiler option exactOptionalPropertyTypes is enabled because this option ensures that undefined does not become redundant in this context.

Detection of undefined types hidden behind type aliases requires the TypeScript compiler option strictNullChecks (or strict) to be enabled. When neither option is set, the rule only detects undefined types that appear directly in the property’s type annotation.

The rule also suppresses issues when undefined is only reachable through a type defined in an external library (for example, React.ReactNode). In that case the user cannot modify the library’s type declaration, so flagging the property would produce a false positive.

Resources

Documentation